Unfiltered Candor and Straightforwardness in Action

Unfiltered Candor and Straightforwardness in Action

In a recent turn of events, a South African academic institution has come under scrutiny for its treatment of an unnamed individual. The case, which has sparked controversy, raises questions about the institution's adherence to labour laws and the rights of academic staff.

The individual, who had been employed at the hospital for five years, was suddenly placed on unpaid leave without any prior warning. This move, it appears, was not supported by a legal or contractual basis, potentially constituting an unfair labour practice or a breach of contract under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) and the Labour Relations Act (LRA).

The individual's attempts to find employment were deliberately sabotaged, and their disability pension, which is about 70% of their salary and does not increase with inflation, was offered as an alternative. This pension, however, came with a condition: the individual would need to see a doctor regularly to determine if they are ready to work, should they choose to accept it.

The individual's "leave" was claimed for the previous unpaid sick leave, during which they were treated in a private psychiatric hospital for five years. Despite this, the Head of School decided that the individual was not eligible for sick leave, and all leave had to be taken as unpaid leave. The individual was also suspended from salary and benefits.

The staff union president and mentor informed the individual that some colleagues would refuse to work with them, with no clear reason given other than "he smokes too much." This negative reputation, it seems, was deliberately fostered to prevent the individual from making a success of their employment.

The main help provided at the hospital was sorting out the individual's medication, as they were experiencing fatigue and anxiety, as well as personal problems. The individual's chances for employment were good, as they were known by the potential employer for a long time.

However, the institution's actions may not go unchallenged. Under South African law, unpaid leave may be lawful if it is mutually agreed upon or part of a valid retrenchment process, but this must follow due process as set out in the LRA. Any deviation from these processes exposes the employer to legal challenge.

Illegal dismissal—termination of employment without a fair reason and a fair procedure—is strictly prohibited under South African law. The LRA requires that dismissals be substantively fair and procedurally fair, including notice, an opportunity to state a case, and a right to appeal. If found guilty of unfair dismissal, the employer may be ordered to reinstate the employee or pay compensation of up to 12 months’ remuneration, depending on the circumstances.

While most academic staff are treated as ordinary employees under the LRA, they enjoy the same protections against unfair dismissal. The Policy on Professional Qualifications for Lecturers in Technical and Vocational Education and Training further regulates conditions of service, including dismissal and employment progression, for TVET lecturers. Academic institutions must align their human resource practices with both the LRA and relevant sector-specific policies—any deviation could be challenged on procedural or substantive grounds.

South Africa’s labour laws are currently under review, with proposed amendments to the BCEA and LRA that could strengthen employee protections, including increased severance pay and clearer dismissal procedures. Employers are also expected to comply with new Codes of Good Practice, which may simplify pre-termination processes but maintain high standards of fairness. Employers with more than 50 employees must also comply with Employment Equity Act transformation plans, which affect hiring and dismissal practices.

In conclusion, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to South Africa’s labour laws and sector-specific regulations to avoid costly and damaging legal disputes. Employers—including academic institutions—should always ensure compliance to protect their reputation and the rights of their employees.

1. The controversy surrounding the South African academic institution's treatment of an employee has brought light to the importance of adhering to both labor laws and the rights of academic staff, particularly in matters related to workplace wellness and health and wellness, given the individual's alleged struggle with mental health issues.
2. It is crucial for employers, including academic institutions, to ensure they respect the rules set by science and evidence-based practices when it comes to mental health in the workplace, as failure to do so can jeopardize business news and their reputation, placing them at risk of legal challenges and potential financial consequences.
3. The South African institution's actions towards this particular employee, including placing them on unpaid leave, sabotaging future employment opportunities, and conditional pension offerings that require continued medical assessments, raise concerns about the institution's commitment to fostering a workplace that prioritizes health and mental health wellness as part of their business strategy.

Read also: