UK Woman Secures £322,400 in Compensation following Unjust Termination on Day Off by Employer
A UK Woman Claims a Sizable Compensation After a Suspect Redundancy
In an unexpected turn of events, a woman from the UK named Joanne Neil gained a substantial compensation of around £25,000 (approximately Rs 28 lakh) after her employers, Dermalogica UK, unfairly dismissed her. The employment tribunal in Croydon, South London, acknowledged that the skincare firm breached Neil's labor rights by denying her the opportunity to ask questions about the redundancy process during a Microsoft Teams meeting.
The verdict was made public in a report by The Telegraph. The tribunal found that Neil's mental health already vulnerable, had significantly deteriorated following her sudden dismissal. Neil was not informed of the meeting's purpose and was not given the chance to question her HR representatives.
Judge Liz Ord remarked that the brief notice period for the meeting and the misleading title of the invitation made Neil feel blindsided and unprepared. The meeting was held on a day when Neil wasn't supposed to work, and it was attended by Neil's manager, Ian White, and another executive on the call. During this meeting, Neil was informed that she was being let go.
According to the court documents, Neil was identified for redundancy in November 2022. She had struggled with her mental health since January 2022 but was denied the option to work from home for two days a week. Despite her frequent breakdowns in front of her colleagues, Neil couldn't take a day off as she was entitled to only two days' sick pay per year.
The employment tribunal also highlighted the indirect sex discrimination in Neil's firing since women were more likely to work part-time roles, which was a breach of the part-time workers' regulations. Notably, Neil managed to keep her job after another employee left the department.
In a nutshell, UK law mandates that redundancy processes should not disadvantage part-time workers, who are predominantly women, unless the employer can provide a sound justification for the practice. Failure to comply with this requirement can lead to successful claims of indirect sex discrimination at employment tribunals, as demonstrated by the Dermalogica UK case. Employers must treat all employees fairly, follow proper procedures, consider flexible working options, and avoid policies that disproportionately exclude part-time workers.
*Also Read | Missing For 60 Years, Wisconsin Woman Found "Alive and Well"*
- In light of the Dermalogica UK case, it's crucial for workplaces to prioritize mental health and wellness in the redundancy process, ensuring fair treatment and adherence to health-and-wellness guidelines.
- This general news story about Joanne Neil's successful claim highlights the importance of scientific understanding in recognizing and addressing mental health issues in the workplace, particularly during times of transition such as redundancies.
- The crime-and-justice implications of a company's handling of employee redundancies, as seen in the Dermalogica UK case, underscores the need for broader workplace-wellness measures, supporting not just physical but also mental health for all employees.
