Scientific teams affirm continued efforts on the American climate evaluation project
Rewritten Article:
In a serious blow to climate change science, the Trump administration has let go of around 400 scientists who were working on the National Climate Assessment (NCA), leaving the report's status in the lurch. Scheduled for publication in early 2028, the sixth edition of the comprehensive review of climate science faced an uncertain future following the mass dismissals that took place in late April 2025.
The scientists, who had been working diligently on their respective chapters for about a year, received an email stating that their roles were terminated since the administration was reassessing the report's scope to align with legal requirements. This abrupt decision has sparked significant concern within the scientific community about the likelihood of completing the report without the valuable input of the hundreds of experts, many of whom were privately employed.
Further disruptions came in the form of the cancelation of a major contract with ICF International, a consulting firm that provided significant technical support and staffing for the Global Change Research Program. The administration has been consistently criticized for downplaying climate change risks and reshaping the program to minimize what it deems as "climate alarmism," all while maintaining close ties to the fossil fuel industry.
The absence of the NCA could lead to a drastic gap in vital information that various levels of government, as well as private entities, use for climate preparedness and long-term strategic planning in sectors like agriculture, urban planning, and transportation. The report also plays a crucial role in ensuring consistent language and coordination among various federal agencies involved in disaster response and climate policy.
Against this backdrop, major science organizations like the American Geophysical Union and the American Meteorological Society have announced plans to publish the work meant for the assessment in their journals, should the authors elect to do so. Brandon Jones, the union's president and a program director with the National Science Foundation, emphasized the importance of protecting communities and future generations from the mounting risks of climate change through collaboration and providing the necessary scientific data.
Simultaneously, it's essential to note that this collaboration does not replace the federal report, which is congressionally mandated. The White House has yet to issue a statement regarding the matter.
In light of these developments, the scientific community remains apprehensive about the likelihood of completing the NCA without the input of the dismissed scientists. Some experts express optimism about the possibility of forging ahead with their work, while others view the current scenario as a setback that underscores the need for sustained political will and support for climate science research.
© 2025 The New York Times Company
- The terminations of around 400 scientists working on the National Climate Assessment (NCA) have raised concerns within the scientific community about the completion of the report, as it relies heavily on environmental science and the expertise of these specialists in fields like climate change and health-and-wellness.
- The absence of the NCA, a comprehensive review of climate science, could potentially hinder climate preparedness and strategic planning in sectors like agriculture, urban planning, and transportation, as well as prevent coordination among federal agencies involved in disaster response and climate policy, thereby impacting the broader health-and-wellness and environmental-science landscapes.
