Skip to content

Organ Donation: Which Approach - Opt-In or Opt-Out - Is More Effective?

Debate over Organ Donation: Which System – Opt-In or Opt-Out – Is More Effective?

Every 10 minutes, a new individual in the United States joins the queue for an organ transplant.
Every 10 minutes, a new individual in the United States joins the queue for an organ transplant.

Organ Donation: Which Approach - Opt-In or Opt-Out - Is More Effective?

Organ donation policies worldwide vary significantly, and the age-old question remains: Is it better to have an opt-in or opt-out system? To shed light on this, researchers from the UK examined the organ donation protocols of 48 nations.

An opt-in system requires individuals to actively register to donate their organs posthumously. On the other hand, in an opt-out system, organ donation occurs automatically unless a specific request is made before death to exclude organ donation.

Prof. Eamonn Ferguson, the study's lead author from the University of Nottingham, UK, acknowledges the potential drawbacks of relying on individuals' active decisions:

"People may not act for numerous reasons, including loss aversion, effort, and believing that the policy makers have made the 'right' decision and one that they believe in."

Inaction in an opt-in system might lead to missed opportunities for donors who would have consented, while inaction in an opt-out system could result in individuals who do not wish to donate unknowingly becoming donors.

The United States currently uses an opt-in system. Last year, 28,000 transplants were made possible due to organ donors, with around 79 people receiving organ transplants every day. Sadly, approximately 18 people die daily due to a shortage of donated organs.

Researchers from the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University in the UK analyzed the organ donation systems of 48 countries for 13 years, with 23 using an opt-in system and 25 using an opt-out system.

They found that countries using opt-out systems had higher total numbers of kidneys donated, making it easier for people on organ transplant waitlists to get the organ they need. Opt-out systems also had a greater overall number of organ transplants.

Opt-in systems, however, had a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This discrepancy in living donor rates is thought to be related to the policy's influence and warrants further attention.

The authors acknowledge that their study was limited in not distinguishing between different degrees of opt-out legislation and other factors that may influence organ donation.

The researchers suggest that their results can be used to inform future policy decisions, but additional data, such as consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability, should be collected and made publicly accessible to strengthen their findings.

Prof. Ferguson suggests that future studies could also explore the beliefs, wishes, and attitudes of those making the decision to opt in or opt out. By combining different research methods, researchers could develop a deeper understanding of the impact of consent legislation on organ donation and transplantation rates.

The authors acknowledge that countries using opt-out consent still face organ donor shortages. Changing the system completely may not solve the issue. Instead, they suggest that modifying consent legislation or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model" could improve donor rates. Spain currently has the highest organ donation rate in the world, thanks to a combination of factors such as a transplant coordination network and better public information about organ donation.

Recently, there has been discussion about farming animal organs for human transplants as a potential solution to the organ shortage. However, this issue warrants further examination to determine if it is a viable solution or if changes to organ donation policy should be the focus instead.

  1. In some countries with opt-out organ donation systems, a higher number of kidneys are donated, potentially reducing the waitlist for organ transplants.
  2. While opt-out systems have the potential to increase organ donation numbers, opt-in systems exhibit a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, a discrepancy that warrants further investigation.
  3. The study suggests that future policy decisions could benefit from considering the different impacts that opt-in and opt-out systems have on organ donation and transplantation rates.
  4. As potential solutions to the organ shortage are explored, such as farming animal organs for human transplants, it is crucial to consider the effectiveness of changes to organ donation policy as well.

Read also:

    Latest