Organ Donation: Should the Approach Be Consent-Based (Opt-In) or Presumed Consent (Opt-Out) System?

Organ Donation: Should the Approach Be Consent-Based (Opt-In) or Presumed Consent (Opt-Out) System?

Organ Donation: Opt-In or Opt-Out? A Global Analysis

Worldwide, the approach to organ donation varies significantly, posing the question of which system - opt-in or opt-out - yields the best results. A team of researchers from the UK delved into the organ donation practices of 48 countries to determine which method works best.

In opt-in systems, individuals must actively register to donate their organs post-mortem. Conversely, opt-out systems automatically assume organ donation unless a specific request is made to withhold organs.

Prof. Eamonn Ferguson, the study's lead author from the University of Nottingham, acknowledged a potential drawback of these systems: "People might not act due to various reasons like loss aversion, effort, or believing that the decision-makers have made the right choice."

However, inaction in an opt-in system may lead to reluctant donors, while inaction in an opt-out system might result in unwilling donors.

The United States employs an opt-in system. Last year, 28,000 transplants were made possible thanks to organ donors, with around 79 transplants performed daily. Tragically, approximately 18 individuals die daily due to a scarcity of donated organs.

Opting In or Opting Out?

The researchers from the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University analyzed the organ donation policies of 48 countries over a 13-year span, with 23 using an opt-in system and 25 utilizing an opt-out system.

They measured overall donor numbers, transplants per organ, and the total number of kidneys and livers transplanted from both deceased and living donors.

The study revealed that countries using opt-out systems experienced higher numbers of kidney donations, the organ most in demand for transplant recipients. Opt-out systems also facilitated more overall organ transplants.

Opt-in systems, however, boasted a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This "unreported influence" of policy on living donation rates, as Prof. Ferguson describes, is an intriguing subtlety that warrants further consideration.

The authors admit that their study had limitations, such as not distinguishing between different degrees of opt-out legislation and overlooking other factors that may influence organ donation.

Moving Forward

The researchers published their findings in BMC Medicine, stating that "opt-out consent may lead to an increase in deceased donation but a reduction in living donation rates. Opt-out consent is also associated with an increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted."

They propose that these findings might guide future policy decisions. However, they suggest that their results could be strengthened further by routinely collecting international organ donation data, including consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability, and making this data publicly accessible.

Prof. Ferguson proposes further research into the individual perspectives on opting in or opting out: "Further research beyond country-level epidemiological approach would involve examining issues from the perspective of the individual in terms of beliefs, wishes, and attitudes, using a mix of survey and experimental methods."

The study's authors note that countries using opt-out consent still face organ donor shortages. A complete system change is unlikely to solve such a problem. They suggest that consent legislation or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model" could be potential solutions for boosting donor rates.

Spain currently has the highest organ donation rate globally. Their success is attributed to measures such as a transplant coordination network operating both locally and nationally, as well as improving the quality of public information available about organ donation.

Recently, Medical News Today featured an article on the potential use of animal organs for human transplants as a possible solution to the organ shortage. Alternatively, could this be a problem to be addressed through changes to organ donation policy?

Written by James McIntosh

1. The researchers' study in BMC Medicine found that countries using opt-out consent systems experience higher numbers of kidney donations, the organ most in demand for transplant recipients, and more overall organ transplants.
2. Opt-in systems, on the other hand, have a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, which the study authors refer to as an "unreported influence" of policy on living donation rates.
3. The authors propose that adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model," which includes a transplant coordination network and improved public information about organ donation, could be potential solutions for boosting donor rates.
4. While countries using opt-out consent still face organ donor shortages, the authors suggest that policy changes or using consent legislation could be potential solutions, and they call for further research into individual perspectives on opting in or opting out.

Read also: