Organ Donation: Debating Between Consent-Based (Opt-In) and Presumed Consent (Opt-Out) Approaches

Organ Donation: Debating Between Consent-Based (Opt-In) and Presumed Consent (Opt-Out) Approaches

Worldwide, the approach to organ donation varies significantly, with a persistent debate on whether opt-in or opt-out systems offer the best results. A team of researchers from the UK has evaluated organ donation policies in 48 countries to determine which system is effective.

In an opt-in system, individuals must actively register to donate their organs following death. On the other hand, an opt-out system enables organ donation to occur automatically unless the individual specifically requests otherwise before death.

Professor Eamonn Ferguson, the study's lead author from the University of Nottingham, admits that both systems rely on individual decisions, which can lead to drawbacks:

"Individuals may not take action due to a variety of reasons, such as loss aversion, effort, and the belief that policy makers have made the appropriate decision."

While inaction in an opt-in system might result in individuals who wish to donate not doing so (false negatives), inaction in an opt-out system could potentially lead to an individual who does not wish to donate becoming one (false positive).

The US currently follows an opt-in system, facilitating approximately 28,000 transplants last year through organ donors. Although this is commendable, around 18 people still die daily due to a scarcity of donated organs.

After analyzing the organ donation protocols of 48 countries for 13 years—23 using opt-in and 25 using opt-out—the researchers concluded that countries employing opt-out had higher totals of kidney donations, the organ most sought after by those on the organ transplant list. Furthermore, opt-out systems also led to higher overall organ transplant numbers.

Opt-in systems, however, showed a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This influence on living donation rates, according to Prof. Ferguson, is an observed yet unreported subtlety that requires consideration.

The study's limitations included not differentiating between various degrees of opt-out legislation, with some countries requiring permission from next-of-kin for organs to be donated. The observational nature of the study also left unassessed other factors influencing organ donation.

Researchers suggest their findings could inform future policy decisions and could be strengthened further through the routine collection of international organ donation information, including consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability. Such information should then be publicly available.

Prof. Ferguson also proposes that future studies analyze the opinions of individuals who make the decision to opt in or opt out:

"Further research should examine individual beliefs, wishes, and attitudes using a combination of surveys and experimental methods."

The authors note that countries using opt-out consent still experience organ donor shortages. Complete system change is therefore unlikely to resolve the problem. Instead, they suggest that consent legislation or adopting elements of the "Spanish Model" could enhance donor rates.

Spain boasts the highest organ donation rate globally, attributed to measures such as a transplant coordination network working locally and nationally, and the provision of high-quality public information regarding organ donation.

Recently, discussions have arisen about the possibility of farming animal organs for human transplants as a potential solution to the organ shortage. Alternatively, addressing the issue through changes to organ donation policy may be more appropriate.

1. In an opt-out system, organ donation occurs automatically unless the individual specifically requests otherwise, and this system is associated with higher totals of kidney donations, the organ most sought after by those on the organ transplant list.
2. On the other hand, opt-in systems show a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, which is an observed yet unreported subtlety that requires consideration.
3. The study's findings could inform future policy decisions, and researchers suggest that routine collection of international organ donation information, including consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability, could strengthen their conclusions further.
4. Professor Eamonn Ferguson proposes that future studies analyze the opinions of individuals who make the decision to opt in or opt out, using a combination of surveys and experimental methods to examine their beliefs, wishes, and attitudes.

Read also: