Skip to content

Ensuring Adherence to Regulations at Government Buildings

Enforcement of environmental regulations made easier for federal facilities through Compliance Monitoring by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Surveillance of Adherence to Regulations at Federal Establishments
Surveillance of Adherence to Regulations at Federal Establishments

Ensuring Adherence to Regulations at Government Buildings

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a robust Environmental Audit Program aimed at ensuring the environmental integrity of federal facilities. This program, guided by the EPA's Design Guidelines and Generic Protocol, focuses on identifying potential violations, promoting pollution prevention, and encouraging self-monitoring by facilities.

One of the key aspects of this program is addressing access to "Classified" and "Non-Classified" National Security Sites. The EPA works in cooperation with federal agencies to verify compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders, while respecting the need for national security.

The EPA's audit policy encourages federal agencies to proactively verify their compliance, and it excludes violations resulting in harm or endangerment from its incentives. Significant penalty reductions are offered under the policy for entities that meet certain conditions, such as voluntary discovery and prompt voluntary disclosure in writing to the EPA within 21 days of discovery.

The EPA's audit policy also requires correction and remediation within 60 days of discovery, prevention of recurrence of the violation, and no repeat violations. This proactive approach aims to assist in targeting inspection activities, establish compliance assistance and enforcement priorities, evaluate program strategies, communicate information to the public, and prevent recurring violations.

State and Tribal environmental agencies play pivotal roles in compliance monitoring at federal facilities. They conduct inspections, oversee regulatory programs, and ensure adherence to environmental laws and permits, such as those under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) or the Clean Air Act (CAA).

Self-monitoring by federal facilities is integral to these oversight efforts. Facilities conduct their own monitoring of emissions, discharges, or other environmental impacts, producing data that inform regulators about ongoing compliance. This routine self-monitoring helps identify potential issues early and supports transparency.

Environmental Management Systems (EMS) provide a framework that federal facilities can adopt to systematically manage environmental impacts. EMS facilitates continuous improvement by integrating planning, implementation, monitoring, and corrective actions into routine operations. When EMS programs are well implemented, they assist State and Tribal agencies by enhancing compliance reliability and reducing the regulatory burden through improved internal controls.

In summary, compliance monitoring at federal facilities is a collaborative effort where State and Tribal environmental agencies enforce regulations and conduct inspections, supported by federal oversight as needed. Self-monitoring by facilities and EMS frameworks enhance the effectiveness, timeliness, and efficiency of compliance verification and enforcement efforts.

[1] Federal Facilities Inspections: A guide to EPA's access and inspection authorities [2] EPA's Generic Protocol for Conducting Environmental Audits of Federal Facilities [3] EPA's Environmental Audit Program Design Guidelines for Federal Agencies [4] Resolving Efforts to Deny Access [5] Understanding the Terms "Delegated" and "Authorized" in the context of State/Tribal Roles In Compliance Monitoring [6] Executive Order (E.O.) 12088 and its relevance to the State/Tribal Roles In Compliance Monitoring [7] Establishing a strong enforcement presence in cooperation with state and tribal environmental agencies at all federal agencies with potential environmental impact [8] Clarification of CERCLA Entry Policy [9] Identifying opportunities for pollution prevention [10] EPA will not make routine requests for audit reports [11] Yurok Tribe’s federally recognized authority to set water quality standards on their lands (example of Tribal authority under the Tribal Authority Rule) [12] The understanding of compliance patterns within federal agencies aims to assist in targeting inspection activities, establish compliance assistance and enforcement priorities, evaluate program strategies, communicate information to the public, and prevent recurring violations.

  1. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a policy that encourages proactive verification of compliance with environmental regulations on federal facilities, focusing on pollution prevention and self-monitoring.
  2. Significant penalty reductions are offered for entities that meet certain conditions, such as voluntary discovery and prompt voluntary disclosure to the EPA, under their audit policy.
  3. Once a violation is discovered, correction and remediation must occur within 60 days, with measures taken to prevent recurrence of the violation and avoid repeat violations.
  4. To achieve their goals, the EPA works with environmental agencies at the state and tribal levels, who conduct inspections, oversee regulatory programs, and enforce adherence to environmental laws and permits.
  5. Environmental Management Systems (EMS) can reduce the regulatory burden and improve internal controls at federal facilities, enhancing compliance reliability for agencies conducting oversight.
  6. Addressing compliance patterns within federal facilities is crucial, aiming to identify opportunities for pollution prevention, improve program strategies, communicate information to the public, and prevent recurring violations.

Read also:

    Latest